CarRemorse

Congratulations. Your Dashboard May Have a Side Hustle.

Congratulations. Your Dashboard May Have a Side Hustle.

The problem isn't that your car collects data. It's what happens next.

If you drive a modern car, you already know it's probably collecting data. Location. Speed. Braking. Acceleration. App activity. Annoying? Yes. Creepy? Sure. Shocking? Not really anymore.

The GM OnStar scandal is different — because it showed what that data can become after it leaves the car: a consumer-reporting file that insurers can use to price you, judge you, or deny you coverage.

That's the part every car buyer should care about.

GM sold OnStar Smart Driver as a driving coach. Hard braking, speeding, acceleration — maybe useful feedback, maybe not. But according to the FTC, GM and OnStar didn't clearly explain what was really happening. The FTC alleged that GM collected, used, and sold precise geolocation and driving behavior data from millions of vehicles without adequately notifying consumers or getting their affirmative consent. Some location data was collected as often as every three seconds.

That's not a cute driving score. That's a surveillance-grade driving diary.

Here's where it gets consequential. According to the FTC, GM sold driver behavior and geolocation data to consumer reporting agencies, which used it to compile reports about consumers. Those reports could then be used by insurance companies to set rates or deny coverage.

Read that chain slowly: car feature → driving data → consumer report → insurance decision → money out of your pocket.

That is not a privacy-policy footnote. That is a financial consequence.

There's a legitimate debate about usage-based insurance. Some people knowingly install an insurer's app or plug-in device in exchange for a potential discount. They understand the trade. The GM situation was different — the FTC alleged that GM used a misleading enrollment process, and that some consumers didn't realize they'd signed up for Smart Driver at all. Some enrolled while trying to activate roadside assistance.

One is a deal you knowingly made. The other is a deal you may have accidentally clicked into.

The FTC order and a separate $12.75 million California settlement (announced in May 2026) apply to GM and OnStar — not the entire industry. Ford, Toyota, Tesla, Honda, and everyone else did not become bound by the GM order just because GM got caught. Other automakers can read the room, update their flows, and send worried memos to legal. But unless a company is under its own order or state-law obligation, your protection depends on that company's practices and whatever opt-outs are buried in the app or service agreement.

GM also didn't promise to stop collecting all driving data. Connected cars can still transmit data for emergency response and legitimate purposes. The issue was never "no data can ever leave the car." The issue is purpose, consent, and consequence.

Under the FTC's final order, GM must get affirmative express consent before collecting or sharing connected-vehicle data, let U.S. consumers request and delete their data, and allow opt-outs for geolocation and driver behavior collection. Most critically, GM is banned for five years from disclosing that data to consumer reporting agencies.

That last part is the line buyers should focus on. Not "does my car collect data?" but "can that data become part of a report used to price or deny me?"

So before you buy, lease, or activate a connected-service trial, ask the dealer or manufacturer directly:

  • Is driving behavior data shared with LexisNexis, Verisk, insurers, or data brokers?

  • Can it be used for insurance pricing or risk scoring?

  • Can I use navigation, emergency services, or the app without sharing it?

  • Where, exactly, do I turn this off?

If the answer is "just read the privacy policy," assume the real answer is: we'd rather you stop asking.

The GM scandal isn't a story about data collection in the abstract. It's a story about your car creating consequences outside the car. Your braking becomes a score. Your score becomes a report. Your report becomes a premium increase — and you may not find out until the bill arrives.

Before you sign anything: can what this car collects be used against your wallet later?

Related Articles

The Coming Car-Monitoring Fight Is About More Than Drunk Driving

The Coming Car-Monitoring Fight Is About More Than Drunk Driving

A little-noticed provision in the 2021 infrastructure law has become a flashpoint in the larger debate over how much surveillance Americans should accept inside their cars.

Can You Disable the Seatbelt Chime on a Toyota RAV4?

Can You Disable the Seatbelt Chime on a Toyota RAV4?

You just picked up your new Toyota RAV4. You're excited, the new car smell is intoxicating, and then — ding ding ding ding ding. The seatbelt chime kicks in, and it is relentless. If you've found yourself Googling this at 11pm out of sheer frustration, you're not alone. It's one of the most common complaints from new RAV4 owners, and the answer to whether you can silence it is: yes, but it depends on your model year and how far you're willing to go. Here's everything you need to know.

Your Car Won't Start: How Vehicle Tracking Systems Can Brick Modern Vehicles

Your Car Won't Start: How Vehicle Tracking Systems Can Brick Modern Vehicles

You slide into the driver’s seat, press the start button, and… nothing. No dashboard lights. No engine crank. Your luxury car has become an expensive paperweight. Not because of a mechanical failure or dead battery—but because its factory-installed tracking system lost contact with a satellite or server and decided the vehicle was being stolen. This exact scenario played out across Russia in late November 2025, when hundreds of Porsche owners woke up to immobilized cars. The culprit? Porsche’s Vehicle Tracking System (VTS), a satellite-linked anti-theft module standard on models built since 2013. When the VTS lost connectivity, it triggered the engine immobilizer, cutting fuel delivery and preventing the cars from starting. Dealerships reported a surge in identical complaints from Moscow to Krasnodar. Owners described vehicles that had been running fine suddenly refusing to respond.